Legal Opinion

Fields, Inc. v. Evans

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1929No. 2195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The defendant in error has filed a motion to strike the bill of exceptions from the files. This motion was submitted to this court for determination some time since and while it was under consideration by the court counsel for plaintiff in error sought and obtained a correction of the record by an entry nunc pro tunc in the court below. The correction thus made leaves the record in such a state that the motion is not well-founded and, no error having been prosecuted to the making of the entry nunc pro tunc, the defendant in error cannot complain, even if it was irregularly and erroneously…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webb v. Western Reserve Bond & Share Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McGuire v. . Bell Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Augusta Friedman's Shop, Inc. v. YeatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Maloney Tank Mfg. Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Hedlund v. Sutter Medical Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Rhone v. Try Me Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  5. Triplett v. Western Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API