Legal Opinion
Rhone v. Try Me Cab Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 29, 1933No. 5658PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HITZ, Associate Justice.
This ease comes here by writ of error to the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia and presents a question of some public importance touching the operation of taxicabs in Washington, under the present system of control, or the lack of it.
The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, was a passenger in a taxicab and claims to have been injured by negligence of its driver.
The declaration names as defendants Williams, the driver; Jackson, registered as owner of the cab; and the Try Me Cab Company, a corporation, applicant for registration of the cab and whose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Maloney Tank Mfg. Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Schweinhaut v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Augusta Friedman's Shop, Inc. v. YeatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Callas v. Independent Taxi Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Kaus v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Black & White, Inc. v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Harlem Taxicab Ass'n v. NemeshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Greene v. Amritsar Auto Services Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.