Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Colorado National Bank of Denver

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1992No. 90CA0248PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

Defendant, Colorado National Bank of Denver (the bank), appeals from the judgment of the trial court decreeing the specific performance of an option contained within a limited partnership agreement. This option permitted plaintiff, Don Friedman, to purchase the interest of a deceased limited partner, whose estate is being administered by the bank. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the court’s dismissal of his claims against the bank for tortious interference with contract, rejection of his claim for consequential damages, award to the bank of interest on the option price,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Bunnett v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. FulenwiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Decker v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Chemco, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. FCC Construction, Inc. v. Casino Creek Holdings, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API