Legal Opinion

Mickelson v. Duluth Building & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1897No. Nos. 10,484—(110)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying its motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action by a borrowing member of the defendant association to recover an alleged surplus realized on a mortgage foreclosure sale over and above the amount due on *536the mortgage. The principal question discussed by counsel was the proper mode of computation to be adopted in determining the amount due on the mortgages of defaulting borrowing members; and it was stated that, while the amount involved is small, this case is important, as the decision will determine how the defendant, under its scheme, must compute the amount due on other mortgages. The schemes of modern building…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nippolt v. Firemen's Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Fitzgerald v. Hennepin County Catholic Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. McDonough v. Hennepin County Catholic Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API