Hooper v. Hooper
Oregon Supreme Court
From Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge. Department 2. This is a suit by B. M. Hooper against Mary Hooper for a divorce. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNary
This is a suit to declare a marriage contract void agreeably to the provision of Section 502, L. O. L.: “All marriages which are prohibited by law, on account of consanguinity between the parties, or on account of either of them having a former husband or wife then living, or on account of either of them *189being one fourth or more of negro blood, shall, if solemnized within this state, be absolutely void.”
On the 2d day of October, 1911, at the city of Vancouver, Washington, the parties litigant weré married. Six days later plaintiff brought this suit to annul the marriage, complaining that a…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Heflinger v. HeflingerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Huard v. McTeighOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Thomas v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- McCain v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Twigger v. TwiggerOregon Supreme Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.