Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Murphy

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 9, 1939No. 7256PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

In this action of ejectment, the question is plaintiff’s legitimacy. She claims as the heir of William M. Murphy. The ■declaration alleges the following facts, among others. In February, 1904, William M. Murphy and Elizabeth Dixon agreed to become husband and wife. They thereupon cohabited as such in the District of Columbia, and continued to do so for years, including years subsequent to 1918. Plaintiff was born to them in October, 1905. In 1918, William’s wife Harriet ■obtained a divorce, in the District, on the ground of William’s adultery with Elizabeth. After…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Cartwright v. McGownIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Lanham v. LanhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In Re the Estate of HaffnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Bell v. Tug ShrikeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rhoda J. Chase, and Charles W. Chase, Elinor R. Chase Jones, Georgia E. Chase Snell and Lawson W. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API