Louisville Pillow Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky. There was no opinion below. Compare U. S. v. Tiffany (C. C.) 137 Fed. 971.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.
On February 25, 1903, the plaintiff in error, the Louisville Pillow Company, having imported into the United States 30 bales of feathers, of the invoice value of $1,714, entered the same at the port of Louisville for consumption, as “undressed'’ feathers, dutiable under paragraph 425 of the act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule N, 80 Stat. 91 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,, p. 1675], at 15 per centum ad valorem. The feathers were classified as entered, the duties, liquidated at $257.10, were paid, and they were withdrawn for consumption. Afterwards, on March 13, 1903,'…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. PhelpsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
- Beard v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gandolfi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc., and International Cargo and Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. ParkhurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Didier v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.