Legal Opinion

Sooy v. Cerf

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The principal question presented on this appeal may be stated as follows: In a suit by one partner against another, after dissolution of the partnership, upon his individual promissory note, may the defendant partner, in order to diminish or defeat plaintiff’s recovery, set up by way of counterclaim a cause of action for an accounting for money of the dissolved partnership collected by the plaintiff partner after the dissolution, in which counterclaim it is alleged that such accounting will show that there is in the hands of plaintiff and belonging to defendant partner a sum in excess of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Pacific Finance Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Luse v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wood v. BrushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tomales Bay Oyster Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API