Legal Opinion

Ross v. County Court of Marion County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the county court to make an order allowing petitioner the sum of $20 a month from the moneys of said county for the support of herself and child, under the provisions of section 27-1301, et seq., Oregon Code 1930.

The alternative writ of mandamus shows, in substance, that petitioner, a woman, has one child under the age of sixteen years; that her husband died January 12, 1929; that petitioner and her child are dependent wholly upon petitioner’s labor for their support; that the child has no property of its own; that petitioner and her husband, the father…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PlummerOregon Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Johnson v. CRADDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Bowles v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State v. BurlesonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. United States v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API