Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bowles v. Olson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1944PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

Our first inquiry is whether the district court of Multnomah County has jurisdiction to try cases brought under the provisions of the Emergency. Price Control Act by purchasers as plaintiffs against vendors who have violated ceiling price regulations. If the district court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of such actions, the writ would be demurrable upon that ground alone and we would be relieved from considering the many other questions raised concerning its sufficiency.

Respondent Olson offers no substantial argument and cites no authority tending to cast doubt upon the duty of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Matheny v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bowles v. Barde Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Johnson v. CRADDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Miller v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API