Legal Opinion

Meisenheimer v. . Alexander

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 13, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The evidence tended to show that on or about 15 April, 1912, plaintiff and one W. M. Paul had acquired and held an option on a valuable lot in the city of Charlotte, known as the mansion house lot, at the stipulated price of $80,000, and as a consideration had deposited their notes for $500 each. That desiring to avail themselves of their option, the holders, with others, chiefly the defendants, (229) proposed to form a corporation and erect a sky-scraper on such lot, to cost not less than $400,000, the undertaking to be entered upon when a bona fide stock subscription of $100,000 should have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Wood v. Corry Water-Works Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marzec v. NyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Cardwell v. . GarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Wright v. Phillips Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API