Wright v. Phillips Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
Two questions of law are presented upon the record:
1. Is the plaintiff estopped from asserting his claim for salary under the facts of this ease?
2. Is the judgment of the District Court res adjudicataf
The plaintiff alleges that in December, 1919, at a regular meeting of the directors of the corporation, he was employed for a period of five years at a salary of $5,000 a year. The minutes of the corporation, however, for that meeting declare that it was “ordered that Geo. W. Wright be paid a salary of $5,000 for the year 1919.” The plaintiff, George W. Wright, who wrote the minutes of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bailey v. . HassellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Everett v. . StationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Winstead v. Hearne Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Meisenheimer v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lowder v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931