Legal Opinion

Wood v. Corry Water-Works Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtActieson, J.

On the 29th day of March, 1886, the firm of Samuel R. -Bullock & Co. and the Corry Water-Works Company, a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, entered into a contract whereby the former agreed to construct for the latter water-works in the city of Corry, Erie county, Pa., according to certain plans and specifications, and to pay all the expenses, legal fees, a.nd salaries, which might be needed to maintain and operate the works for a period of six months after completion, and to pay the first six-months interest,- — viz. §3,000, — on the hereinafter mentioned mortgage bonds of the water…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Manhattan Hardware Co. v. Phalen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Westerlund v. Black Bear Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Garmany v. LawtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. McKee v. Title Insurance Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. G. V. B. Min. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API