Lansdown v. Huff
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for Chelan county, Grimshaw, J., entered July 2, 1917, granting a new trial, after verdict in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— This action was brought by the appellant upon several causes of action, seeking to hold the respondent as a copartner with "George H. Strevel, alleging that the respondent and Strevel were, at the time the indebtedness sued upon was contracted, co-partners doing business under the name of International Brokerage Company. The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of the appellant upon each cause of action. A motion for a new trial was made upon all of the statutory grounds, which *278motion was by the trial court granted “upon all of the grounds set out in said motion. ’ ’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snider v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Thomas & Co. v. HillisWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Taylor v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- McGraw v. Manhattan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lowenstein v. WhitelawWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Collyer v. EgbertWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Richmond v. DennyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Johnson v. SlusserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982