Legal Opinion

Creasman v. Creasman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2002No. COA01-828PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from judgment denying his motion to set aside default judgment. After careful consideration of the briefs and record, we affirm.

Verna Creasman (“plaintiff’) is the mother of Tommy Creasman (“Tommy”). Tommy was married to the mother of Clinton Creasman (“defendant”). Tommy is not the natural father of defendant. While not blood relatives, plaintiff and defendant shared a grandmother-grandson relationship.

Plaintiffs husband died in September 1999. On 5 November 1999, plaintiff, a 75 year old woman, executed a durable power of attorney appointing defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. County of Wayne Ex Rel. Williams v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Moore v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Town of Chapel Hill v. BurchetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wood v. WeldonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Broadbent v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Hultquist v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Milton M. Croom Charitable Remainder Unitrust v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Monaghan v. SchillingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API