Legal Opinion
Popple v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 5, 1990No. 310 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, Judge.
Gene Popple, trading as Popple Brothers (permittee), seeks review of a determination of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) which approved the per*377mittee’s application for a highway occupancy (driveway entry) permit, but upon the condition that the permittee pay for a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 315 and an access driveway for a diner/motel operated by Mary Occhipinti and Skyliner Enterprises, Inc. (objector).1 We affirm.
The issue is whether the hearing officer abused his discretion or committed an error of law by approving the permittee’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hardee's Food Systems, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Centennial School District v. Commonwealth, Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Centennial School District v. Commonwealth Department of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LongoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Nardo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin Media v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- East Allegheny School District v. Secretary of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Nasser v. Empire Sanitary Landfill, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Plumstead Township v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994