Legal Opinion

Nardo v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1988No. Appeal No. 2723 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

Frank A. Nardo and June A. Nardo (petitioners), petition for review of a decision made by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT), denying an as-built application of a driveway onto a state highway. We affirm.

In their desire to develop a tract of ground for commercial purposes, petitioners had previously been issued by DOT, a highway occupancy permit to construct a driveway with curbing. The plan also defined the internal traffic pattern in the area. The area bordered a state highway from which traffic would enter and exit.

Subsequently, as petitioners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Haas v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ristvey v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Popple v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Brandywine Village Associates, LLP v. PA Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Plumstead Township v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API