Legal Opinion
Schmaltz v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 6, 1995No. 91 C 6128PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion to bar the expert testimony of Drs. Dunlap, Hessl, and Sehonfeld pursuant to Fed. R.Evid. 702. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is granted.
Facts
Plaintiff, Arthur E. Schmaltz (“Mr. Schmaltz”), was employed by defendant, Norfolk & Western Railway Company (“N & W”), as a carman. On May 1, 1990, at- approximately 7:00 p.m., N & W sprayed areas of the Calumet Yard with two herbicides, atrazine and tebuthiuron, pursuant to its vegetation control policy program. Mr. Schmaltz began his shift in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Cherrye Bradley v. Pickens BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Guevara v. FerrerTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Cavallo v. Star EnterpriseDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- In Re Breast Implant LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Delores Turner etc. v. Iowa Fire EquipmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Delores F. Turner Russell Turner v. Iowa Fire Equipment Company, an Iowa Corporation, - Iowa Fire Equipment Company, Third Party v. Kidde-Fenwal, Inc. Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.