Legal Opinion

Tibbitts v. Openshaw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1967No. 10512PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Respondents (Tibbitts) and appellants (Openshaw) entered into a real estate contract wherein the former agreed to sell and the latter agreed to buy certain real property located in Riverdale City, Utah. The purchase price was $45,000, payable in specified installments. Appellants paid all but approximately $4,400 and respondents— treating the contract as a note and mortgage — brought this action. Respondents were successful in securing a judgment from which the appellants appeal.

The property involved consisted of two subdivision lots, each of which had a house thereon, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Elgin v. HustedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Yanish v. FernandezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Schepps v. HoweWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Casavant v. CampopianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  4. Conyers v. MolloyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Fennell v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API