Legal Opinion

Conyers v. Molloy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1977No. 14016PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

Does an implied warrant of habitability exist in Illinois?

If so — can it be waived?

Let us see.

Mr. and Mrs. Conyers purchased a house from Mr. Molloy, a builder. They alleged that — due to a lack of ventilation in the attic — water damage resulted in the house not being fit for habitation. Also, they say, they had no experience as housebuilders and relied on Molloy’s expertise. A contract had been entered into and the following language is contained in paragraph 18 thereof:

“There are no warranties on either house except those manufacturers warranties that are in effect.”

The Conyers’ further…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Griffin v. Wheeler-Leonard & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Kirk v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Banville v. HuckinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Herlihy v. Dunbar Builders Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API