Conyers v. Molloy
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
Does an implied warrant of habitability exist in Illinois?
If so — can it be waived?
Let us see.
Mr. and Mrs. Conyers purchased a house from Mr. Molloy, a builder. They alleged that — due to a lack of ventilation in the attic — water damage resulted in the house not being fit for habitation. Also, they say, they had no experience as housebuilders and relied on Molloy’s expertise. A contract had been entered into and the following language is contained in paragraph 18 thereof:
“There are no warranties on either house except those manufacturers warranties that are in effect.”
The Conyers’ further…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Griffin v. Wheeler-Leonard & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Kirk v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Banville v. HuckinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Herlihy v. Dunbar Builders Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.