Legal Opinion

Moulton v. Moulton

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1920No. L. A. No. 5297PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Richard L. North and Oscar T. Barber for Plaintiff and Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, J.,

pro tern.—This action was brought by plaintiff to impress a resulting trust in her favor upon certain real property.

Plaintiff is the surviving wife of Ernest S. Moulton, deceased, and the defendant is the administrator of his estate. The complaint alleges that decedent during his lifetime received from her a certain sum of money which was her separate property and which, with her consent, was invested by deceased in certain, business property situated in the city of Riverside, state of California, the title to which was taken in his own name, in trust, however, for plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. BroughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Nilson v. SarmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Flournoy v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Dyment v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gomez v. CecenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hogevoll v. HogevollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Ellis v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API