Legal Opinion
In Re Horton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 26, 2003No. C1-02-2266PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Trust beneficiary John R. Horton is incapacitated and has been civilly committed by Crow Wing County to the Brainerd Regional Treatment Center. Crow Wing County Social Services (CWCSS) seeks review of a district court order concluding that the assets of the John R. Horton Irrevocable Trust were not “available” liquid assets, thus relieving the trustee from any obligation to fund Horton’s placement in a less-restrictive, adult-care facility. Because we conclude that the John R. Horton Irrevocable Trust is a discretionary trust and the settlor did not intend for the trust…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Builders Ass'n v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Appeal of Decision of Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- In Re Estate of MealeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Federal National Mortgage Association v. Jeffrey D. Robinson, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.