Legal Opinion

Fannie Mae v. Ferraro

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided November 20, 2009No. 10662 of 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COX, J,

Before the court for disposition is the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the plaintiff Fannie Mae, which argues that the plaintiff has a right to immediate possession of the property and the defendants’ counterclaim should be dismissed as it is an improper collateral attack of a valid sheriff’s sale.

The plaintiff has filed this action in ejectment against Janet M. Ferraro, deceased, or the occupants of 314 Roberts Lane, New Castle, Lawrence County, Pennsylvania. Carl D’Augostine and Linda D’Augostine (occupants) are the current occupants of the property in question. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Miller v. Sacred Heart HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. MAZZADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API