Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gardner v. Consolidated Rail Corp. SEPTA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1990No. 40 E.D. Appeal Docket 1989Published

1Dissent

LARSEN, Justice.

I dissent.

The issue presented by these two appeals is whether a political subdivision has a duty to maintain safe playgrounds. It is clear to me that when “city fathers” decide to locate a public playground adjacent to property which poses a hazard to the children who are encouraged to use that playground, they are obligated to erect and maintain barriers on the perimeter of the playground to prevent ingress and egress at a location that brings the children into contact with the adjacent hazard. The majority commits a grave error in holding to the contrary.

In the first appeal,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Paraska v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Weber v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Novak v. Ford City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API