Legal Opinion

SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1989No. 60 E.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allowance of appeal to the City of Philadelphia (City) to determine whether Superior Court erred in affirming in part an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, sitting en banc, insofar as it denied the City’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.1 Because the City properly preserved the issue of whether it owed a duty to the Appellee, Edward Scarborough, contrary to the Superior Court’s holding that the issue was waived, the order of Superior Court is in part reversed and the City’s motion for judgment not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Gradel v. InouyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Stewart v. ChernickySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Consolidated Rail Corp. SEPTASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cagey, J., Aplt. v. PennDOTSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. NELSON BY AND THROUGH STUCKMAN v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API