Barr Marine Products Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
At issue are twenty-five documents, submitted for in camera inspection, that plaintiff says are discoverable and defendant asserts are protected by the attorney-client privilege. A brief summary of the state of the law with regard to the privilege will be helpful in assessing the privilege claim as to each document.
THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE:
The purpose of the attorney-client privilege is to encourage complete disclosure of information between client and attorney. As the Third Circuit has observed in its most recent opinion on the privilege, In re…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Honorable Bernard M. Decker, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 18, 1981, Etc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- In re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hardy v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.