Legal Opinion

Proctor v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 23, 2010No. A-10112PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

Bradley Proctor was convicted of two counts of assault after a jury trial in which he claimed self-defense. On appeal, Proctor argues that the trial judge should not have admitted testimony about his reputation for violence in prison. We conclude the judge could reasonably conclude that the prison population was a group with whom Proctor habitually associated and that the admission of this evidence did not violate Proctor’s right to cross-examination.

Proctor also contends that the judge should not have allowed one alleged victim to testify using diagrams she prepared…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. BoutonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Larson v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  2. Darroux v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API