Proctor v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Judge.
Bradley Proctor was convicted of two counts of assault after a jury trial in which he claimed self-defense. On appeal, Proctor argues that the trial judge should not have admitted testimony about his reputation for violence in prison. We conclude the judge could reasonably conclude that the prison population was a group with whom Proctor habitually associated and that the admission of this evidence did not violate Proctor’s right to cross-examination.
Proctor also contends that the judge should not have allowed one alleged victim to testify using diagrams she prepared…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BoutonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Larson v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
- Darroux v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011