Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Faber

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 22, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bodine, S.

This appeal concerns the construction to he placed on section 249-q of the Tax Law as amended in 1946 (L. 1946, ch. 380), as applied to remainders where the life tenant has the right of invasion.

*829This amendment inserted the words “ and indefensibly vested in ” in subdivisions a and b so that it is now provided that no exemption is granted to a spouse in subdivision a or to descendants or others named in subdivision b unless the share to which they are entitled is “ transferred to and indefensibly vested in ” them. Prior to the amendment, it has been held (Matter of Cregan, 275 N. Y.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of CreganNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of DowlingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  3. In re the Estate of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
  4. In re the Estate of StubblefieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of IngrahamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  2. In re the Estate of Van CottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  3. In re the Estate of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  4. In re the Estate of BensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  5. In re the Estate of WeinbergerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API