In re the Estate of Faber
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bodine, S.
This appeal concerns the construction to he placed on section 249-q of the Tax Law as amended in 1946 (L. 1946, ch. 380), as applied to remainders where the life tenant has the right of invasion.
*829This amendment inserted the words “ and indefensibly vested in ” in subdivisions a and b so that it is now provided that no exemption is granted to a spouse in subdivision a or to descendants or others named in subdivision b unless the share to which they are entitled is “ transferred to and indefensibly vested in ” them. Prior to the amendment, it has been held (Matter of Cregan, 275 N. Y.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Estate of CreganNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- In re the Estate of DowlingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- In re the Estate of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- In re the Estate of StubblefieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of IngrahamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re the Estate of Van CottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Estate of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re the Estate of BensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- In re the Estate of WeinbergerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948