Legal Opinion
In Re the Estate of Cregan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1937PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
In his last will and testament, probated in Bronx county where the testator resided, Martin J. Cregan provided that after payment of minor bequests, the residue of his property should be held in trust for the following uses and purposes:
“ Ninth: To pay the income thereof to my beloved wife, Cecelia Elizabeth Cregan during her life.
“ Tenth: At the time of the death of my beloved wife, Cecelia Elizabeth Cregan, I will and direct that my executors and trustees shall pay over to my beloved children hereinafter named, the fractional part of my residuary estate as hereinafter mentioned.
“ (a) To my…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ithaca Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Edwards v. SlocumSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- In Re the Estate of WeidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re the Tax upon the Estate of CreganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re the Estate of VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Moore v. GallupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- In Re the Estate of RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- In re the Estate of BehmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- In re the Estate of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.