Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Walsh

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 16, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGarey, S.

The problem presented on this motion, is the applicability of the provisions of section 249-q of the Tax Law which provide for exemptions in favor of the widow and sons of this decedent.

*351In 1946 the applicable statute was amended (L. 1946, ch. 380) so as to add the words, “ and indefeasibly vested in ” after the words “ transferred to ”, so that as now phrased, said section 249-q provides that there shall be exempted from estate tax so much of the net estate not exceeding $20,000 as is “ transferred to and indefeasibly vested in ” a surviving spouse and also, so much of the net…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Marsh v. Consumers' Park Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of DowlingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  2. In re the Estate of PayneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
  3. In re the Estate of StubblefieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  4. In re the Estate of FaberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  5. In re the Estate of Van CottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API