Legal Opinion
State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Griffith
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 25, 1984No. 81-04743; CA A26441PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
SAIF appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that found claimant’s worsened psychological condition compensable. We reverse.
All members of the Board concluded that claimant was not in reality subjected to any form of harassment or discrimination in connection with her work. The Board stated:
“Contrary to the referee’s finding that part of the harassment which claimant believed she was suffering at work was real, substantial and deliberate, we find that the overwhelming majority of this harassment was merely imagined. The medical evidence is nearly unanimous in this regard, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Booker v. Cherokee Water DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stokes v. Board of Review of Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Leary v. Pacific Northwest BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984