Legal Opinion
Canatella v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 2002No. 00-16782PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed on June 12, 2002, and appearing at slip op. 8487 [293 F.3d 1099] is amended as follows:
At slip op. page 8499 [293 F.3d at 1105-06], delete the first full paragraph (beginning “In reciting the factual background concerning the California State Bar disciplinary system ....”) through the end of section B at slip op. page 8501 [293 F.3d at 1107] (last sentence reads “Because this was the only action that had taken place at the time Canatella filed his federal complaint .... ”), and substitute the following in its place:
The major issue in Hirsh, in determining whether…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Lopez v. CandaeleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Canatella v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Meredith v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.