Lopez v. Candaele
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
OPINION
Today we consider a student’s First Amendment challenge to a community college sexual harassment policy. First Amendment cases raise “unique standing considerations,” Ariz. Right to Life Political Action Comm. v. Bayless, 320 F.3d 1002, 1006 (9th Cir.2003), that “tilt[ ] dramatically toward a finding of standing,” LSO, Ltd. v. Stroh, 205 F.3d 1146, 1155 (9th Cir.2000). Despite this lowered threshold for establishing standing and the disturbing facts of this case, we conclude that the student failed to make a clear showing that his intended speech on religious…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Carrico v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Steve Cooksey v. Michelle FutrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of EducatioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.