Legal Opinion
Sixty-Six Crosby Associates v. Berger & Kramer, L. L. P.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered June 3, 1998, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court properly denied the motion to compel plaintiffs to answer a second set of interrogatories since summary denial of such a motion is mandated when it is made without a proper affirmation of good faith as required by 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) (see, Vasquez v G.A.P.L.W. Realty, 236 AD2d 311; Matos v Mira Realty Mgt. Corp., 240 AD2d 214). Concur— Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vasquez v. G.A.P.L.W. Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Matos v. Mira Realty Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunlop Development Corp. v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Pandolf v. American International Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Nikpour v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- Gordon v. HancockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rothlein v. W.W. Norton & Co.New York Supreme Court · 2000