Legal Opinion

Rothlein v. W.W. Norton & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard F. Braun, J.

This is an action for libel. Plaintiff sued the authors and publishers of a book and article in which he claims he was defamed. Defendant The Conde Nast Publications, Inc. (Conde Nast), the publisher of the article, has already had its motion to dismiss the complaint granted, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), for failure to state a cause of action (Riccardi, “Vanity Fair” *68Wins Dismissal From Dali Profile Libel Suit, NYLJ, Mar. 1, 2000, at 1, col 3; Rothlein v Norton & Co., Mar. 3, 2000, at 26, col 5 [Sup Ct, NY County]). Now, defendant John Richardson…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Love v. William Morrow & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Tomasino v. Morrow & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Matos v. Mira Realty Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. MelisoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API