Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Blosenski
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 7, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-2059, 93-1976PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
The above captioned actions, which have been consolidated for trial, are brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., to determine and allocate responsibility for the clean-up of hazardous wastes from a landfill in Chester County, Pennsylvania. The trial has been trifurcated, with Phase I concerned solely with the liability of certain defendants for response costs associated with the cleanup. See Order of October 29, 1993. 1
Plaintiffs in both actions have moved for summary…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. USX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Foster v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Ninth Ave. Remedial Group v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- United States v. Cordova Chemical Company Of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.