Legal Opinion
Foster v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 1996No. Civ. 95-722 (CRR)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-captioned case 1 are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ pleadings, the entire record herein, and the law applicable thereto, the Court shall grant the defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment on the plaintiffs claims under the CERCLA for past costs he has incurred investigating contamination located at his property in Southwest Washington, D.C., and on the defendants’ counter-claims against the plaintiff that he is liable under the CERCLA as a current owner of the property.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- William Liebhart v. SPX CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Aiello v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Interfaith Community Organization v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.