Legal Opinion
Collins v. Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Co.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided April 1, 1913No. 426PublishedCited by 4 opinions
At Law. Action by Dolin Collins against the Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Company. On motion to remand.
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
This cause was commenced in the state district court, and it having been removed here, the plaintiff now moves that it be remanded, upon the ground that the matter in dispute is not of a value in excess of $3,000. Two causes of action are set forth in the complaint, in each of which damages are claimed for the violation of a contract by which the defendant agreed to furnish water to the plaintiff for irrigation purposes. The first cause concludes ■with this averment:
“That no part of said damages have ever been paid, and there is due to the plaintiff from the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Swann v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1902
- Barber v. Boston & M. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1906
- Simmons v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harley v. Firemen's Fund Ins.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- Stuart v. CreelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. RiddleDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1923
- Lynch v. Yellow Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1935