Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Decided March 4, 1902No. 1,649PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On Motion to Remand to State Court.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

This is a motion to remand a case removed from the state court. The ground of the motion is that the necessary jurisdictional amount is not involved. The plaintiff’s declaration, as it appears in the record brought from the state court, is as follows:

“The petition of Thomas J. Simmons respectfully shows: (1) The Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, hereinafter styled the ‘defendant,’ is a corporation of the state of New York, now and at the times hereinafter mentioned engaged in the business of life insurance; and it had at the time it contracted with petitioner, as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harley v. Firemen's Fund Ins.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
  2. Voorhees v. Ætna Life Ins.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1918
  3. Trullinger v. RosenblumDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
  4. Collins v. Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1913
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API