Legal Opinion

Messer v. Reid

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1948Published

1Opinion

ON Petition to Rehear.

Petition to rehear has been filed in which it is sought to reargue the case: “A rehearing will he refused where no new argument is made, and no new authority adduced, and no material fact is pointed out as over-looked.” Rules of Supreme Court, rule 32, 173 Tenn. 887; Holmes v. Eason, 76 Tenn. 754, 763; Hume v. Bank, 78 Tenn. 1, 7, 43 Am. Rep. 290; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. *100United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 125 Tenn. 658, 691, 693, 148 S. W. 671.

While not insisting that the Court overlooked any facts, petitioner insists that the Conrt overlooked certain legal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. V. L. Nicholson Const. Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Holmes v. EasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Potter v. Golden Rule Grocery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hume v. Commercial BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API