Potter v. Golden Rule Grocery Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
Plaintiff’s intestate, Merritt W. Potter, Jr., received injuries when struck by a truck belonging to defendant Golden Rule Grocery Company, from which he died a few hours thereafter. At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court sustained the motion of the grocery company for a directed verdict without specifically stating any reasons therefor. Prom his remark at the time, the Court of Appeals concluded that he granted the motion upon the theory that the evidence preponderated in favor of defendants which, if true, was error. The Court of Appeals held that there was sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haluptzok v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Townsley v. Yellow Cab Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stafford v. Far-Go Van Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Armstrong v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Tennessee Coach Co. v. ReeceTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Messer v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Driver v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.