Colley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON state’s motion for rehearing.
BEAUCHAMP, Judge.
The State, through its very able district attorney of Smith County, has filed a motion for rehearing with a discussion of the authorities cited to sustain the prosecution. It is contended that the holding of this court is contrary to Hamon v. State, 135 Tex. Cri. Rep. 347, 119 S. W. (2d) 1057; Brooks v. State, 115 S. W. (2d) 678; Bryant v. State, 98 S. W. (2d) 189; Brooks v. State, 95 S. W. (2d) 136; Warren v. State, 94 S. W. (2d) 463; Greer v. State, 32 S. W. (2d) 845, and Wesley v. State, 147 S. W. (2d) 493.
The very exhaustive opinion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wesley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Greer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Hamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.