Bankers Trust Co. of New York v. Greims
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
We concur in the findings of the advisory master, “that the testatrix’ husband is not entitled to avail himself of the devise of the lands and real estate situate in New Jersey, mentioned in paragraph 3 of her will; that such lands and real estate must be regarded as part of testatrix’ residuary estate, and pass to her executors and trustees to sell and dispose of subject to the terms and provisions of the ninth, tenth and twelfth paragraphs of her will.”
We concur generally also in the train of reasoning leading up to those findings.
The decree under review is therefore affirmed.
For…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RobertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Barrett v. BarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- In Re Estate of ColeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Mirinda v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Darpino v. D'ArpinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.