Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Cole
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 18, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
200 N.J. Super. 396 (1984)
491 A.2d 770
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NATHANIEL B. COLE.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Middlesex County.
Decided April 18, 1984.
Thomas Pliskin, for Estate of Nathaniel B. Cole (Giordano, Halloran and Crahay, attorneys).
Phillip Lindeman II, for Tara K. Cole (Hellring, Lindeman, Goldstein and Landau, attorneys).
John Eugene, for Bernice Cole.
Jack Borrus, for certain corporations and partnerships (Borrus, Goldin and Foley, attorneys).
OPINION
COHEN, RICHARD S., J.S.C.
This suit focuses on New Jersey's surviving spouse's elective share statute. N.J.S.A.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hammond v. WheelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Alexandria National Bank v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Matter of Estate of GloverHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Bankers Trust Co. of N.Y. v. GreimsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Gesner v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aragon v. Estate of SnyderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Ziegenbein v. Hastings CollegeNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re Del Guercio EstateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- In re the Estate of BilseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Matter of Estate of FriedleinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.