Legal Opinion

Van Dissel v. Jersey Cent. Power & Light

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 30, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

194 N.J. Super. 108 (1984)

476 A.2d 310

GERRIT J. VAN DISSEL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 7, 1984.

Decided May 30, 1984.

Before Judges BISCHOFF, KING and PETRELLA.

Edward J. Dauber argued the cause for appellants (Greenberg & Dauber, attorneys; Alan R. Hoffman and Eugene M. Friedman, of counsel; Alan R. Hoffman on the brief).

Clarence P. Reberkenny argued the cause for the respondent (Davis & Reberkenny, attorneys; Clarence P. Reberkenny and Robert…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shaner v. Horizon Bancorp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Bennett v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Gaines v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Pittman v. LaFontaineDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API