Legal Opinion
Pittman v. LaFontaine
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 18, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-1258PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Marlene Pittman (“Pittman”) brought this action pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., against her former employer Immunomedics, Inc. (“Immu-nomedics”), Phyllis Parker (“Parker”), the Personnel Manager of Immunomedics, Edward Newman (“Newman”), Pittman’s former supervisor and George LaFontaine (“LaFontaine”), a former employee of Im-munomedics (Immunomedics, Parker and Newman are collectively referred to as the “Movants,” and the Movants and LaFon-taine are collectively referred to as the “Defendants”).
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Matter of Estate of DawsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Tonka Corp. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- First Union National Bank v. Penn Salem Marina, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Michaels v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Hernandez v. Region Nine Housing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.