Legal Opinion

Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1912No. 1589PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Love County Court; R. A. Keller, Judge. Action by the Doggett Grain Company against the Ardmore Oil & Mining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SPIARP, C.

This case presents error from the county court of Love county. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, counsel for defendant announced that he did not care to introduce any testimony, and thereupon demurred to the evidence offered by plaintiff, which demurrer, after due considera tion, was overruled and • exceptions thereto taken. Thereupon the court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant, to which action of the court defendant excepted, and the case is brought here for review.

No motion for a new trial was ever filed, and therefore this court cannot…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Darling v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Stump v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Buoy v. Clyde Milling & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Gruble v. RyusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  5. Hartwell v. Equitable Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harper v. Rutland Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. v. School Board of School Dist. No. 31Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API