Darling v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
At the outset of this case the defendant in error denies the right of the plaintiff in error to be heard and moves the dismissal of the action in this uourt.
The case presented here for review, from the standpoint of the plaintiff in error, is, in substance, this: In *894his action against the railway company issues of fact had been framed and a jury had been impaneled to try them; certain material and competent evidence had been introduced which, if true, established some liability against the defendant; certain other material and competent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wagner v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Sullivan v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. I. FrogleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Julien v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Schubach v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.