Pickney v. American Dist. Telegraph Co. of Ark.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EISELE, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss Count II of the plaintiff’s complaint in this Title VII action. The defendant contends that the allegations raised in Count II exceed the scope of the Plaintiff’s EEOC charge and consequently may not be considered. The Court finds the defendant’s position well-taken.
I. FACTS
A. Background
The plaintiff filed a discrimination charge with the EEOC on January 25, 1982, in which she alleged that her former employer, American District Telegraph Company, had subjected her to sex and race discrimination. Her EEOC…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Saul MacKlin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc. Saul MacKlin v. Drivers, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 639Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Pauline Danner v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- King v. Georgia Power CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ollie LATTIMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Frangena A. Shannon v. Ford Motor Co., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Dirks v. J.C. Robinson Seed Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Furtado v. Standard Parking Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- McKinney v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.