Legal Opinion

Kenneth P. Bidlack v. Wheelabrator Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 18, 1993No. 91-2378PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

993 F.2d 603

143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2322, 61 USLW 2726,

125 Lab.Cas. P 10,692,

16 Employee Benefits Cas. 2217

Kenneth P. BIDLACK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

WHEELABRATOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2378.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Feb. 27, 1992.

Reargued En Banc Dec. 15, 1992.

Decided May 18, 1993.

Barry A. Macey (argued), Macey, Macey & Swanson, Indianapolis, IN, Charles S. Leone, South Bend, IN, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James H. Pankow, Timothy W. Woods, Robert W. Mysliwiec, Jones, Obenchain, Ford, Pankow & Lewis, South Bend, IN, Robert P. Christenson, Roger…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wheelabrator Corp. v. BidlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API